Cherry Preserves
Humbug. I've been making jam for over 30 years. I use pectin -
usually Certo, because it's the brand most widely available here. The
advantage to using pectin, in my opinion, is that you can make jam with a
much shorter cooking time, which produces a product that tastes
fresher. It also gives you a higher yield for the amount of fruit
because you're not boiling all the liquid away until it reaches the
gelling point. The results are also predictible and generally foolproof.
It WILL gel most of the time.
On the other hand, there is some
charm to the long-cooked traditional jam flavour that a pectin-based jam
doesn't have. I think that the fruit almost caramelizes and there's a
rich undertone to a jam made that way. However, some fruits just don't
have sufficient natural pectin to gel properly - and so you either have
to boil the heck out of it or be satisfied with a compote-y textured
jam. Plus, if I knew that a batch of jam could take me all day to make,
I'd never bother to do it.
As for keeping qualities - make the
jam according to the pectin package directions and process the jars
properly and it will keep for years. So your mother the jam junkie is
wrong there. I have - and still use - jars of jam that I made 2 or 3
years ago that are absolutely totally fine.
No comments:
Post a Comment